Al Hansen
Al Hansen’s areas of practice are DWI, District and Superior Court criminal cases, Habitual Offender, all Motor Vehicle/License cases as well as Marital Law.
Attorney Hansen was previously an assistant County Attorney, prosecuting cases for the state of New Hampshire. He now represents individuals as a criminal defense attorney and marital attorney in both New Hampshire and Maine. Al has extensive courtroom experience with numerous jury trials under his belt.
He graduated from Bates College in 1991 and earned his law degree at Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, Delaware. He is a member of the New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts Bar Associations. He is also a member of the New Hampshire and National Associations of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Attorney Hansen brings a broad level of experience to our firm, representing individuals and families since 1997.
In addition to spending time with family, Attorney Hansen enjoys skiing, cycling, backpacking and hiking. In 1992, he successfully hiked the entire length of the 2,157 mile-long Appalachian Trail spanning from the foothills in Georgia to Mt. Katahdin in Maine. He brings a compassionate and energetic approach to all his cases.
He currently lives with his wife and daughter in Southern New Hampshire.
Attorney Hansen can be reached by:
email: AHansen@nhattorney.com
phone: 603-624-6655
Representative Cases:
DWI – 27 year old stopped at road check was arrested for DWI. Refused breathalyzer test and was subject to both DWI charge and NH Dept. of Safety administrative license suspension. An administrative suspension was levied by the department of safety, however, the DWI was dismissed at trial.
Divorce – 18 year marriage with 10 and 12 year old children. Suggestion of infidelity and claims that wife brought most of the assets to the marriage. The court concluded this was a “long term” marriage and the assets the wife brought to the marriage were joint assets. The state “child support guidelines” established child support based on the documented earnings of the clients. Assets were spilt 50/50 since the court determined that was “equitable.”
See the case results page and remember that every case is different and our past results cannot guarantee the outcome of your particular claim.
Connect with us on Facebook.
